From: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Merge Append Patch merged up to 85devel |
Date: | 2009-07-25 19:12:40 |
Message-ID: | 3073cc9b0907251212p3e9b972cub6a60153e5049ca7@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Greg Stark<stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's a copy of the merge-append patch that I sent months ago merged up to
>>> head. I haven't really added any additional functionality since then.
>>
>> Can you provide some more details about the objective of this patch? Or a
>> link to previous discussion?
>
i was trying to test this one but i can't find a query that produces a
diferent plan than in 8.4.0, attached my current test just in case...
what kind of query is this intended to help?
something, maybe style dependant, that i don't like is the definition
of LAPPEND_PATH_FLATTEN_APPENDPATHS macro at some point in the middle
of the file i prefer they be defined at the top (just my
preference)... or there is a reason for doing it there?
another thing a don't like is those #ifdef FIXME surrounding already
existing if, why are those? and if they need to be fixed why there
isn't a comment explaining what the fix is or what it should behave?
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
test-mergeappend.sql | text/x-sql | 2.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua Tolley | 2009-07-25 19:24:05 | Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-07-25 18:21:13 | Re: mixed, named notation support |