From: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest) |
Date: | 2009-07-11 00:56:20 |
Message-ID: | 3073cc9b0907101756s6b433824i2bf35f623ee1c2a9@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Jaime
Casanova<jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Mark Kirkwood<markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> wrote:
>>
>> So here is my initial attempt at this, at this point merely to spark
>> discussion (attached patch)
>>
>
> this patch doesn't apply cleanly to head... can you update it, please?
>
i did it myself, i think this is something we need...
this compile and seems to work... something i was wondering is that
having the total time of lock waits is not very accurate because we
can have 9 lock waits awaiting 1 sec each and one awaiting for 1
minute... simply sum them all will give a bad statistic or am i
missing something?
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
lockstats-2.patch | text/x-diff | 49.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Crawford | 2009-07-11 01:00:00 | Re: Maintenance Policy? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-11 00:39:56 | Re: Maintenance Policy? |