From: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TODO items |
Date: | 2009-07-02 21:54:52 |
Message-ID: | 3073cc9b0907021454l6eb6fb95vd6698c8274ee47ba@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>> I guess todo items marked as [D] (Done) should be removed now... right?
>
>> Would there be some value in creating a new page TodoDone84 and moving
>> those items to it?
>
> In the past we've figured that old TODO versions could be retrieved
> from CVS history. While that's still possible in the wiki environment,
> it might be worth saving the old entries in a more easily accessible
> fashion.
>
We want to use the same format/sections like in the TODO?
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-02 22:04:23 | Re: TODO items |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-07-02 21:52:21 | Re: TODO items |