| From: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
|---|---|
| To: | Paul Wehr <sf_psql_general(at)informationsoftworks(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUMP: Using foreign key constraint to eliminate unnecessary joins in view |
| Date: | 2009-04-13 22:09:19 |
| Message-ID: | 3073cc9b0904131509n3e95e908raf40e3a6216247cd@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Paul Wehr
<sf_psql_general(at)informationsoftworks(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I am looking for a way to get the plan to show only a seq scan of test2,
> since test1 does not contribute any columns, and we know from the
> not-deferrable-not-null-primary-key that there will always be exactly one
> match.
>
> Am I just missing something obvious, or does postgresql (currently) not do
> that?
>
postgres will look at all tables involved, i think there is work to
make it smart enough to make what you describe but that's in the
future...
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | NTPT | 2009-04-13 22:58:15 | Re: In memory Database for postgres |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-04-13 22:08:11 | Re: "PostgreSQL in the cloud" now up on media.postgresql.org |