Re: Doubts about EvalPlanQual

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jacky Leng <lengjianquan(at)163(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Doubts about EvalPlanQual
Date: 2009-02-19 22:28:07
Message-ID: 3073cc9b0902191428l7f8fe145p540130010cea79e2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/19/09, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> (I'm unconvinced that it is dead code, but even if it is it'd be folly
>> to remove it.)
>
> Agreed, it's a useful safeguard, even it it's a "can't happen" scenario.
>

if it is a "can't happen" scenario then why not make it an assert?

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-02-19 22:50:38 Re: Doubts about EvalPlanQual
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-02-19 22:25:15 Re: Fixing Grittner's planner issues