From: | "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
---|---|
To: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: two postgres server seeing the same data |
Date: | 2008-12-03 21:41:40 |
Message-ID: | 3073cc9b0812031341t241c48das369fdb08d276d195@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Jaime Casanova
>> <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:43:24AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>>> You may have two servers pointed at $PGDATA but at no point can
>>>>> postgresql be running on both at the same time.
>>>>
>>>> More importantly, if you do this, you will probably be able to get the
>>>> two postmasters to start up. This will permanently corrupt the data.
>>>
>>> is this true even if one of the server just send SELECTs?
>>
>> yes.
>
> even if it sends NO queries. just starting the second postmaster is enough
>
ok... actually i see no real value in that config (create a single
point of contention) but everyone that has used (or at least read
about) oracle think is the best thing to do...
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-12-03 21:43:31 | Re: two postgres server seeing the same data |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-12-03 21:40:01 | Re: two postgres server seeing the same data |