Re: pg_get_serial_sequence Strangeness/Unreliable?

From: "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Jeff MacDonald" <oss(at)bignose(dot)ca>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_get_serial_sequence Strangeness/Unreliable?
Date: 2008-11-26 21:16:25
Message-ID: 3073cc9b0811261316w16514722i96030385fac97cdb@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Jeff MacDonald wrote:
>>> Hi Tom, so far as I know the table "owns" the serial in so much as when i
>>> do a \d of the table it says this
>

can we make \d show if the sequence is owned by the table (ie: serial
or manually created and owned) or is a manually created and maked
default sequence? maybe a flag?

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-11-26 21:17:27 Re: Odd on-update inconsistency
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-11-26 20:53:24 Re: pg_get_serial_sequence Strangeness/Unreliable?