Re: CommitFest rules

From: "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Alex Hunsaker" <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: CommitFest rules
Date: 2008-07-07 18:17:48
Message-ID: 3073cc9b0807071117r7e07e1b2n81293c51cb1273db@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/5/08, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:
>
> I think people are still working there way through the process, but it's
> starting to sound like submitting a patch involves two steps from now on;
> email to the list, and add your patch to the next commitfest page. Does that
> sound right?
>

yeah! that was always the process... email to -hackers the proposal,
design, discussion, etc... email to -patches the patch itself... the
only change is that we are no longer using -patches for this but the
commitfest page.

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. (593) 87171157

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-07-07 18:37:57 Re: CommitFest rules
Previous Message Ken Camann 2008-07-07 18:13:55 Windows 64-bit work in progress patch