From: | "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
---|---|
To: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Alex Hunsaker" <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: CommitFest rules |
Date: | 2008-07-07 18:17:48 |
Message-ID: | 3073cc9b0807071117r7e07e1b2n81293c51cb1273db@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/5/08, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:
>
> I think people are still working there way through the process, but it's
> starting to sound like submitting a patch involves two steps from now on;
> email to the list, and add your patch to the next commitfest page. Does that
> sound right?
>
yeah! that was always the process... email to -hackers the proposal,
design, discussion, etc... email to -patches the patch itself... the
only change is that we are no longer using -patches for this but the
commitfest page.
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. (593) 87171157
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-07 18:37:57 | Re: CommitFest rules |
Previous Message | Ken Camann | 2008-07-07 18:13:55 | Windows 64-bit work in progress patch |