| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Time to drop old-style (V0) functions? |
| Date: | 2016-12-20 15:04:54 |
| Message-ID: | 30674.1482246294@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Well, I'm hoping there is a way to have a fast-path and a slow-path
> without slowing things down too much.
Seems like this discussion has veered way off into the weeds.
I suggest we confine it to the stated topic; if you want to discuss
ways to optimize V1 protocol (or invent a V2, which some of this
sounds like it would need), that should be a distinct thread.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-12-20 15:09:18 | Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries |
| Previous Message | Jesper Pedersen | 2016-12-20 15:03:21 | Re: pageinspect: Hash index support |