From: | Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dent John <denty(at)qqdd(dot)eu>, "Iwata, Aya" <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binary reloptions representation for each relation kind instead |
Date: | 2019-10-06 13:57:21 |
Message-ID: | 3066018.uKRLcYz4iL@x200m |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
В письме от пятница, 27 сентября 2019 г. 17:24:49 MSK пользователь Michael
Paquier написал:
> The patch is in this state for two months now, so I have switched it
> to "returned with feedback".
So I've split this patch into even smaller parts, so it would be more easy to
review.
Do not use StdRdOptions in Access Methods
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4127670.gFlpRb6XCm@x200m
Use empty PartitionedRelOption structure for storing partitioned table options
instead of StdRdOption
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1627387.Qykg9O6zpu@x200m
and
Some useful asserts in ViewOptions Macroses
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3634983.eHpMQ1mJnI@x200m
as for removing StdRdOptions for Heap and Toast, I would suggest for commit it
later. It is not critical for my reloptions refactoring plans. I can do it
having one structure for two relation kinds. So we can split it into two
later, or do not split at all...
--
Software Developer: https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/~014a87e140ff02c0da
Body-oriented Therapist: https://vk.com/nataraj_rebalancing (Russian)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2019-10-06 15:17:31 | Re: New "-b slim" option in 2019b zic: should we turn that on? |
Previous Message | Nikolay Shaplov | 2019-10-06 13:45:27 | Re: [PATCH] Do not use StdRdOptions in Access Methods |