Re: Is there a memory leak in commit 8561e48?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "jian(dot)long(at)i-soft(dot)com(dot)cn" <jian(dot)long(at)i-soft(dot)com(dot)cn>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is there a memory leak in commit 8561e48?
Date: 2018-05-02 21:20:37
Message-ID: 30591.1525296037@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Yes, that was the idea. Here is an adjusted patch.

Looks OK to me as far as the leak issue goes. I have no opinion on
whether this is adequate in respect to cleanup-after-error problems.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hartmut Holzgraefe 2018-05-02 21:43:50 Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-05-02 21:13:49 Re: A few warnings on Windows