| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Minimum supported version of Python? |
| Date: | 2014-03-18 22:37:57 |
| Message-ID: | 30542.1395182277@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On 3/17/14, 10:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It doesn't pass the regression tests. Do you need more of a bug report
>> than that?
> It does pass the tests for me and others. If you are seeing something
> different, then we need to see some details, like what platform, what
> version, what Python version, how installed, what PostgreSQL version,
> how installed, actual diffs, etc.
After further experimentation, I've found that 2.3 does pass the regression
tests if one installs the separately-available cdecimal module. So my
complaint reduces to the fact that our "Requirements" documentation
doesn't mention the need for this. Do you have an objection to adding
something there?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-03-18 22:55:21 | Re: Wiki Page Draft for upcoming release |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-03-18 22:02:15 | Re: [HACKERS] First draft of update announcement |