| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahila(dot)syed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY] |
| Date: | 2019-03-26 02:02:52 |
| Message-ID: | 3052c83e-23ed-fde5-fe58-f1cfda1cdafa@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019/03/26 1:53, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Here's v6 of this patch. I have rebased on top of today's CLUSTER
> monitoring, as well as on table AM commits. The latter caused a bit of
> trouble, as now the number of blocks processed by a scan is not as easy
> to get as before; I added a new entry point heapscan_get_blocks_done on
> heapam.c to help with that. (I suppose this will need some fixups later
> on.)
>
> I removed the "M of N" phase labels that Robert didn't like; those were
> suggested by Rahila and upvoted by Amit L. I'm of two minds about
> those. If you care about those and want them back, please speak up.
On second thought, I'm neutral on it too.
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-03-26 02:08:53 | Misleading errors with column references in default expressions and partition bounds |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2019-03-26 01:58:06 | Re: psql display of foreign keys |