From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLE modifications |
Date: | 2003-11-14 18:42:59 |
Message-ID: | 3051.1068835379@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut kirjutas R, 14.11.2003 kell 18:51:
>> I don't recall that, but if so, I would like to revisit that consensus.
> [ Hannu disagrees ]
Please take this thread to pgsql-hackers; if the issue is going to be
contentious then we should try to get a wider spectrum of opinion than
just people who follow -patches.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-14 18:47:17 | Re: Background writer process |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-14 18:39:06 | Re: cvs head? initdb? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-14 19:01:13 | Re: [PATCHES] ALTER TABLE modifications |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-11-14 17:50:25 | Re: [HACKERS] heads up -- subtle change of behavior of |