Re: advance local xmin more aggressively

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: advance local xmin more aggressively
Date: 2009-02-12 04:40:29
Message-ID: 3043.1234413629@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> I could imagine some situations that this could be more useful in the
> future. For instance, Hot Standby will increase the consequences of not
> advancing xmin when it's possible to do so.

The question wasn't really about the consequences; it was about whether
there was any hope of this patch being able to advance xmin more than
the code that's there, for common usage patterns.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-02-12 04:47:49 Re: SE-PostgreSQL and row level security
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-02-12 04:14:17 Re: GIN fast insert database hang