| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Checksums by default? |
| Date: | 2017-01-21 17:23:54 |
| Message-ID: | 30426.1485019434@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> What wouldn't hurt is enabling it by default in pg_regress on master for
> a while. That seems like a good thing to do independent of flipping the
> default.
Yeah, I could get behind that. I'm not certain how much the regression
tests really stress checksumming: most of the tests work with small
amounts of data that probably never leave shared buffers. But it'd be
some hard evidence at least.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-01-21 17:31:23 | Re: pgsql: Logical replication |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-01-21 17:22:51 | Re: Checksums by default? |