From: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What I would say if someone asked me about no win32 |
Date: | 2003-07-30 12:52:04 |
Message-ID: | 303E00EBDD07B943924382E153890E5434A9B2@cuthbert.rcsinc.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
I would tell them to prototype on the cygwin version and port to the
native version when it comes out. I was counting off the days until the
win32 port for 7.4 but (IMO) the developers made the right decision to
delay until the next release. The cygwin version is a drag to install
but should be ok for development purposes.
I used to tell people to use the PeerDirect port but 7.2.1 is missing a
lot of nice features (especially schemas) and that port has some issues
with the WAL which (IMO) make it not very attractive in a production
environment. From what I understand Bruce has resolved these issues in
the official port. 7.4 has some killer features which I think are
under-hyped (for example
John Carmack's mantra regarding the hugely overdue Doom3 project is 'it
will be ready when it's ready'. In software, that's a good motto.
Merlin
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:28 PM
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [pgsql-advocacy] What I would say if someone asked me about no
win32
Q. Hey, I read in a bunch of places that 7.4 was going to have native
windows support, what gives?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2003-07-30 12:57:25 | Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written |
Previous Message | Kaarel | 2003-07-30 12:20:02 | Re: WebGUI vote on whether to drop PostgreSQL support |