| From: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Katie Ward" <kward(at)peerdirect(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Win32 Technical Questions |
| Date: | 2003-02-03 16:51:20 |
| Message-ID: | 303E00EBDD07B943924382E153890E5434A905@cuthbert.rcsinc.local |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>Can the ConsoleApp thing be written in C so we don't have to get an
>extra C++ compiler for one file (for those who don't want to use the
>Microsoft toolchain)?
Critical sections and semaphores and mutexes are all available from the
win32 API. I agree with Peter: I am not sure it is a good idea to
introduce MFC dependency for process control and application
initializations. This would allow compilation without having the MFC
(although, Borland supplies a version of the MFC with its non-free
compilers). Also, a C++ compiler would not be required although this to
me as strictly an aesthetic point.
Likewise, I think the API functions are the best choice for file i/o for
possible adaption of asynch file i/o.
Despite the name, the apps written carefully using the win32 api should
generally compile ok in 64 bit environment.
Merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-02-03 16:51:33 | Win32 Powerfail testing - results |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-02-03 16:51:15 | Re: PGP signing releases |