Win32 Technical Questions

From: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
To: "Katie Ward" <kward(at)peerdirect(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Win32 Technical Questions
Date: 2003-02-03 16:51:20
Message-ID: 303E00EBDD07B943924382E153890E5434A905@cuthbert.rcsinc.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>Can the ConsoleApp thing be written in C so we don't have to get an
>extra C++ compiler for one file (for those who don't want to use the
>Microsoft toolchain)?

Critical sections and semaphores and mutexes are all available from the
win32 API. I agree with Peter: I am not sure it is a good idea to
introduce MFC dependency for process control and application
initializations. This would allow compilation without having the MFC
(although, Borland supplies a version of the MFC with its non-free
compilers). Also, a C++ compiler would not be required although this to
me as strictly an aesthetic point.

Likewise, I think the API functions are the best choice for file i/o for
possible adaption of asynch file i/o.

Despite the name, the apps written carefully using the win32 api should
generally compile ok in 64 bit environment.

Merlin

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2003-02-03 16:51:33 Win32 Powerfail testing - results
Previous Message Neil Conway 2003-02-03 16:51:15 Re: PGP signing releases