| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Workman <justin(at)photolynx(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure on Postgres 9.6.1 |
| Date: | 2017-08-09 03:17:04 |
| Message-ID: | 30355.1502248624@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>> A customer is on 9.6.1, and complains of a segfault observed at least
>> 3 times.
> ...
> For the sake of the archives: this now looks very much like the issue
> that Tom just fixed with commit
> 9bf4068cc321a4d44ac54089ab651a49d89bb567.
Yeah, particularly seeing that $customer noted that some of the
columns involved were UUIDs:
Good to have gotten to the bottom of that one. Too bad it just
missed the train for 9.6.4.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Workman | 2017-08-09 03:29:04 | Re: Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure on Postgres 9.6.1 |
| Previous Message | Beena Emerson | 2017-08-09 02:56:00 | Re: Default Partition for Range |