| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lukas Eder <lukas(dot)eder(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Wrong behaviour of array comparison when arrays contain nulls |
| Date: | 2022-04-06 13:37:52 |
| Message-ID: | 3034594.1649252272@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Lukas Eder <lukas(dot)eder(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> For the following query:
> SELECT array[1, NULL] = array[1, NULL]
> H2 returns NULL whereas PostgreSQL returns TRUE. In my opinion and
> intuition, as well as according to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2016(E) 8.2 <comparison
> predicate> GR 1) b) ii), H2 is right and PostgreSQL is wrong.
If we don't impose a total order on array values, then we cannot build
btree indexes on such columns. So yes, this is a deviation from the
SQL standard, and no we are not going to change it.
As for documentation, section 9.19 says
The comparison operators compare the array contents
element-by-element, using the default B-tree comparison function for
the element data type, and sort based on the first difference.
which implies this behavior but perhaps could be more explicit.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | hirose.masay-01@fujitsu.com | 2022-04-06 17:30:40 | RE: BUG #17421: Core dump in ECPGdo() when calling PostgreSQL API from 32-bit client for RHEL8 |
| Previous Message | Lukas Eder | 2022-04-06 13:13:16 | Re: Wrong behaviour of array comparison when arrays contain nulls |