Re: Free WAL caches on switching segments

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Free WAL caches on switching segments
Date: 2006-02-13 18:22:53
Message-ID: 3033.1139854973@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's still gonna need a configure test and so on.

> The submitter believes the C macro test is sufficient:

Do I get to revert the patch the moment that fails in buildfarm?

More to the point, the utility of the patch remains unproven.
We are not in the habit of adding OS dependencies on speculation.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2006-02-13 18:39:15 Re: [HACKERS] Backslashes in string literals
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-13 18:13:58 Re: Free WAL caches on switching segments