From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Unused header file inclusion |
Date: | 2019-08-19 22:09:55 |
Message-ID: | 30291.1566252595@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2019-08-19 13:07:50 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2019-08-18 14:37:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Oddly, cpluspluscheck does not complain about those cases, but it
>>> does complain about
>> Hm. I don't understand why it's not complaining. Wonder if it's a
>> question of the flags or such.
> I'ts caused by -fsyntax-only
Ah-hah. Should we change that to something else? That's probably
a hangover from thinking that all we had to do was check for C++
keywords.
>> I wish we could move the whole logic of those scripts into makefiles, so
>> we could employ parallelism.
I can't really get excited about expending a whole bunch of additional
work on these scripts.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-08-19 22:53:07 | Re: PANIC: could not flush dirty data: Operation not permitted power8, Redhat Centos |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-08-19 21:18:19 | Re: Unused header file inclusion |