Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c
Date: 2020-03-01 19:42:56
Message-ID: 30269.1583091776@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Rebased again.

Seems to need that again, according to cfbot :-(

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2020-03-01 19:47:29 Re: Some improvements to numeric sqrt() and ln()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-03-01 19:41:17 Re: Delaying/avoiding BTreeTupleGetNAtts() call within _bt_compare()