From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Kumar, Sachin" <ssetiya(at)amazon(dot)com>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects |
Date: | 2024-03-16 22:46:15 |
Message-ID: | 3023817.1710629175@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> On Fri, 2024-03-15 at 19:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This patch seems to have stalled out again. In hopes of getting it
>> over the finish line, I've done a bit more work to address the two
>> loose ends I felt were probably essential to deal with:
> Applies and builds fine.
> I didn't scrutinize the code, but I gave it a spin on a database with
> 15 million (small) large objects. I tried pg_upgrade --link with and
> without the patch on a debug build with the default configuration.
Thanks for looking at it!
> Without the patch:
> Runtime: 74.5 minutes
> With the patch:
> Runtime: 70 minutes
Hm, I'd have hoped for a bit more runtime improvement. But perhaps
not --- most of the win we saw upthread was from parallelism, and
I don't think you'd get any parallelism in a pg_upgrade with all
the data in one database. (Perhaps there is more to do there later,
but I'm still not clear on how this should interact with the existing
cross-DB parallelism; so I'm content to leave that question for
another patch.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-03-16 23:00:56 | Re: Support json_errdetail in FRONTEND builds |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2024-03-16 21:59:45 | Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects |