From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Koen De Groote <kdg(dot)dev(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Foreign Data Wrapper behavior? |
Date: | 2024-10-11 15:59:28 |
Message-ID: | 302362d2-ce6b-4bec-9b7b-a845a982f4cb@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 10/11/24 04:08, Koen De Groote wrote:
> In the release notes for postgres 17 I'm reading:
>
> > The PostgreSQL foreign data wrapper (postgres_fdw), used to execute
> queries on remote PostgreSQL instances, can now push EXISTS and IN
> subqueries to the remote server for more efficient processing.
>
> I'm confused as to what this means. In older versions, are parts of
> queries not sent to the foreign server? Or is this change meant to imply
> the sending of only the subqueries, the result of which is then directly
> used in pushing the entire query?
>
> Or am I still wrong as to what this means?
>
> I looked at the documentation and there doesn't seem to be any
> indication of particular queries not being pushed to the foreign server,
> so this wording that "can now push EXISTS and IN subqueries to the
> remote server" is confusing.
>
> What am I missing?
Read:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/postgres-fdw.html#POSTGRES-FDW-REMOTE-QUERY-OPTIMIZATION
F.36.5. Remote Query Optimization
As to the change in the Release Note see the --hackers discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/c9e2a757cf3ac2333714eaf83a9cc184%40postgrespro.ru
>
> Regards,
> Koen De Groote
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2024-10-11 16:16:30 | Re: Connection between PostgreSQL and SAP HANA database |
Previous Message | Christophe Pettus | 2024-10-11 14:35:06 | Re: PGBouncer - Load balancing options |