Re: CI warnings test for 32 bit, and faster headerscheck

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CI warnings test for 32 bit, and faster headerscheck
Date: 2024-10-03 14:16:00
Message-ID: 301304.1727964960@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Hmm, given that configure uses more time than compiling (assuming 100%
> ccache hits) and is woefully serial, I wonder what ingredients you'd
> need to hash to have bulletproof cache invalidation for a persistent
> configure cache, ie that survives between runs.

The buildfarm uses a simple trick that seems to work remarkably well:
if the animal's previous run failed (for any reason) then blow away
the configure cache. Maybe that could be adapted here.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message torikoshia 2024-10-03 14:17:40 Re: Add on_error and log_verbosity options to file_fdw
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-10-03 13:55:47 Re: pg_trgm comparison bug on cross-architecture replication due to different char implementation