From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Better way of dealing with pgstat wait timeout during buildfarm runs? |
Date: | 2014-12-25 21:40:48 |
Message-ID: | 30127.1419543648@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> writes:
> The strange thing is that the split happened ~2 years ago, which is
> inconsistent with the sudden increase of this kind of issues. So maybe
> something changed on that particular animal (a failing SD card causing
> I/O stalls, perhaps)?
I think that hamster has basically got a tin can and string for an I/O
subsystem. It's not real clear to me whether there's actually been an
increase in "wait timeout" failures recently; somebody would have to
go through and count them before I'd have much faith in that thesis.
However, I notice that at least the last few occurrences on "hamster"
all seem to have been in this parallel block:
test: brin gin gist spgist privileges security_label collate matview lock replica_identity rowsecurity object_address
which as recently as 9.4 contained just these tests:
test: privileges security_label collate matview lock replica_identity
I'm fairly sure that the index-related tests in this batch are I/O
intensive, and since they were not there at all six months ago, it's not
hard to believe that this block of tests has far greater I/O demands than
used to exist. Draw your own conclusions ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2014-12-25 21:52:42 | Re: Better way of dealing with pgstat wait timeout during buildfarm runs? |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2014-12-25 21:28:26 | Re: Better way of dealing with pgstat wait timeout during buildfarm runs? |