From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [9.4] Make full_page_writes only settable on server start? |
Date: | 2013-09-04 15:32:46 |
Message-ID: | 3011.1378308766@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 15:42 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Although this is true, the administrator's estimate of whether that
>> guarantee is or is not provided might not be as consistent as the
>> hardware behavior itself. I am generally of the feeling that having
>> to restart the server to change setting sucks, and while it surely
>> sucks less for this setting than some, mostly because few people
>> change this setting in the first place, I'm still not convinced that
>> this is moving in the right direction.
> I think code complexity matters quite a lot. If we can eliminate some
> complex code in a complex area, and all we give up is a feature with
> essentially no use case, that sounds like we're moving in the right
> direction to me.
Isn't this whole discussion academic in view of Andres' point?
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20130903121935.GB5783@awork2.anarazel.de
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-09-04 15:41:03 | Re: [HACKERS] Is it necessary to rewrite table while increasing the scale of datatype numeric? |
Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2013-09-04 15:28:59 | Re: [v9.4] row level security |