Re: faster testing with symlink installs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: faster testing with symlink installs
Date: 2018-03-22 13:40:39
Message-ID: 30082.1521726039@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> The last complain on the matter I can find actually involves the same
> people as this thread :)
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/54DE457F.2090206%40gmx.net

> So the patch should be marked as rejected or at least returned with
> feedback?

IMO, changing this behavior is more likely to draw complaints
than praise.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Ivanov 2018-03-22 13:53:15 Re: new function for tsquery creartion
Previous Message Bear Giles 2018-03-22 13:36:05 FYI: jOOQ blog