Re: why isn't this subquery wrong?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jonathan vanasco <postgres(at)2xlp(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why isn't this subquery wrong?
Date: 2017-04-20 22:43:50
Message-ID: 30079.1492728230@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

jonathan vanasco <postgres(at)2xlp(dot)com> writes:
> Can anyone explain to me why the following is valid (running 9.6) ?

> SELECT foo_id
> FROM example_a__data
> WHERE foo_id IN (SELECT bar_id FROM example_a__rollup)
> ;

Per the SQL standard, bar_id is interpreted as an "outer reference"
to example_a__data.bar_id. This trips people up all the time, but
(a) it's required by spec and (b) there are cases where it's really
hard to do what you want without an outer reference.

Cautious SQL programmers qualify all references inside sub-selects
to avoid getting caught by this accidentally.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jonathan vanasco 2017-04-20 22:56:14 Re: why isn't this subquery wrong?
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2017-04-20 22:42:06 Re: why isn't this subquery wrong?