Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2019-09-01 23:34, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So did the old wording, it seemed to me. I'm happy to remove the sentence
>> altogether if there's no reason to be pushing people away from MinGW.
>> Should we also rethink the sentence I added at the top of the chapter,
>> pointing Windows people to chapter 17?
> Yeah, I suggest this:
> ...
Hm, I'm tempted to also drop the sentence about the "ready-made installer"
then. It doesn't particularly belong here, and the only way to read it
is as a nudge to not use the MinGW build process.
regards, tom lane