From: | Ken Gunderson <webweaver(at)rmci(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)lan2wan(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications? |
Date: | 1999-11-21 23:54:06 |
Message-ID: | 3.0.6.32.19991121165406.00836100@rmci.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
At 12:04 PM 11/21/99 -0500, Brett W. McCoy wrote:
>> Stephen Birch <sbirch(at)ironmountainsystems(dot)com> writes:
>> Question: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications?
>
>I think it is. In my office, we are converting hundreds of thousands of
<snip>
>database has several million rows across several tables, using a PHP3
>frontend. Here, though, speed is not the consideration but reliable
>performance is. PostgreSQL has been very stable and I have no reason to
>question its reliability. We are going to be moving our drug reaction
>database over onto its own server soon and providing public (although
>secure) access in the near future -- it will be using a mod_perl frontend,
>along with the the PostgreSQL fulltext module.
<snip>
I am curious as to why you are choosing to use mod_perl instead of php3,
especially since you've already been using php3?? And especially with
php4/zend just around the corner. Not trying to start a flame war here, I
just really want to know.
Ciao-- Ken
http://www.y2know.org/safari
Failure is not an option- it comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kane Tao | 1999-11-22 02:00:01 | Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications? |
Previous Message | Brett W. McCoy | 1999-11-21 22:19:00 | Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications? |