Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o
Date: 2002-01-18 03:50:11
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20020118145011.03563e60@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 21:05 17/01/02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>A potentially more serious problem is that if the archiving code chooses
>to issue other operations between the schema restore and data restore
>for the temp table, we might do a \connect and lose the temp table.

Why is this a problem - I presume I don't understand the OID allocation stuff.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2002-01-18 03:55:17 Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny
Previous Message Philip Warner 2002-01-18 03:46:34 Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o