| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christof Petig <christof(at)petig-baender(dot)de> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump: Sorted output, referential integrity |
| Date: | 2001-12-07 23:02:50 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20011208100250.031e7510@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 15:16 7/12/01 +0100, Christof Petig wrote:
>>
>> Not really very generalizable when you consider user defined types,
>> triggers etc.
>
>Hmmm. But if we have a primary key on columns (A,B,C) and request the data
>'order by A,B,C' this should be portable, shouldn't it?
>If we don't have a primary key simply ordering by 1,2,3,...n should also
work.
>Or am I missing something?
My mistake; I thought you wanted to compare metadata. Sorting data by PK
seems like a reasonable thing to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Philip Warner | 2001-12-07 23:21:37 | Re: pg_dump: Sorted output, referential integrity |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2001-12-07 21:41:46 | Re: [SQL] how to change the type |