Re: [WAY OT] Re: PL/java?

Just curious about one thing.

How was the perl app implemented?

It seems Solaris doesn't do/fork processes very well which is why Sun
pushes threads.

Whereas *BSD and Linux do processes about as well as Solaris does threads.

Postgresql doesn't do so well on our Solaris 2GB box as it does on a 128MB
Linux x86 box.

I haven't compared MySQL (threaded) on Solaris vs Linux.

Cheerio,
Link.

At 12:29 PM 9/1/01 +0200, Gunnar Rønning wrote:
>* "Alex Knight" <knight(at)phunc(dot)com> wrote:
>|
>| IMHO, scalability is incredibly important, and perl leaves that out often.
>| Even with Fast-CGI style servers, perl sucks. Perl is great for admin
>| interfaces, or low to medium traffic sites.
>
>We got a contract last december with a customer that were having some
>performance problems with a perl web application. The customer has
>access to the best perl programmers money can buy, but they could not
>fix the performance problem.
>
>We came in to make version 2.0 of the system. In one month we had an
>implementation in Java that outperformed the perl application by a factor
>of 10. The customer could stop the leasing of three of the Sun E450 servers
>they were previously using to run the perl application.
>
>We've had similar experiences in other projects. Every migration
>we've done from Perl->Java has resulted in massive savings.
>
>--
>Gunnar Rønning - gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com
>Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
>
>