| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Setuid functions |
| Date: | 2001-06-24 11:32:25 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20010624213225.00c93700@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 13:28 24/06/01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>If someone wants to implement them, be my guest. I originally needed them
>for fixing the RI permission problems, but they couldn't be used for that
>after all.
>
They were part of a larger permissions overhaul that Jan proposed - IIRC,
at the time you objected, citing your prior proposal. Are you now saying
you are happy with Jan's original proposal? Or just the setuid functions?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2001-06-24 11:37:52 | Re: stuck spin lock with many concurrent users |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-06-24 11:28:00 | Re: Setuid functions |