| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Setuid functions |
| Date: | 2001-06-24 03:47:58 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20010624134758.02356650@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
As a matter of interest, whatever happened to Perter's & Jan's plans for
setuid functions?
From memory, Jan's proposal was shelved in favour of something Peter had
previously proposed, is that right?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-24 05:06:03 | Re: Why would this use 600Meg of VM? |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2001-06-24 03:46:41 | RE: Instrumenting and Logging in JDBC |