From: | Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: installing DBD::Pg without installing postgres |
Date: | 2001-04-24 01:46:20 |
Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20010424094620.00e2adc0@192.228.128.13 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
At 04:30 PM 23-04-2001 -0400, Fran Fabrizio wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>It seems that there should be a way to install the DBD Pg module without
>having to install postgres on the local machine. I tried installing
>just the libs rpm, but that didn't seem to do the trick. I've done some
>usenet and mailing list archive searches, but all the info I'm turning
>up appears geared towards the assumption that you also want postgres
>installed locally. Am I looking in the wrong places?
My guess for installing DBD for any database is you at least need a client
install - libraries, headers.
But postgresql is actually quite easy to install, doesn't take tons of
space, plus there's no cost or licensing problem, so I just install the
whole thing.
Whereas I had a tough time installing DBD for Oracle a couple of years ago.
Cheerio,
Link.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | newsreader | 2001-04-24 02:20:54 | anyone else with mod_perl/apache and 7.1 |
Previous Message | Randall Perry | 2001-04-24 01:41:51 | Re: Var substitution in SELECT statements |