Re: Performance monitor signal handler

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
Cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance monitor signal handler
Date: 2001-03-16 00:28:21
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20010316112821.022e91f0@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 16:17 15/03/01 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
>Lost data is probably better than incorrect data. Either use locks
>or a copying mechanism. People will depend on the data returned
>making sense.
>

But with per-backend data, there is only ever *one* writer to a given set
of counters. Everyone else is a reader.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2001-03-16 00:50:25 Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Previous Message Alfred Perlstein 2001-03-16 00:17:10 Re: Performance monitor signal handler