Re: Performance monitor signal handler

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance monitor signal handler
Date: 2001-03-13 14:42:18
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20010314014218.028acc20@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
>This ought to always give a consistant snapshot of the file to
>whomever opens it.
>

I think Tom has previously stated that there are technical reasons not to
do IO in signal handlers, and I have philosophical problems with
performance monitors that ask 50 backends to do file IO. I really do think
shared memory is TWTG.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-13 14:54:28 Re: Performance monitor signal handler
Previous Message Alfred Perlstein 2001-03-13 14:38:19 Re: Performance monitor signal handler