Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal
Date: 2000-12-08 07:15:30
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20001208181530.0232b560@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 01:27 8/12/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>Recovering the data on a machine
>of different endianness is a project for future data archeologists.

It's frightening to think that in 1000 years time people will be deducing
things about our society from the way we stored data.

>
>Tell you the truth, I don't believe in file-format version numbers at
>all...
>(RFC 2083, esp section 12.13) --- the versioning philosophy described
>there is largely yours truly's.

Seems to be a much better approach; (non)critical chunks & chunk types are
much more portable.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-12-08 07:31:05 Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-12-08 06:43:03 Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ...