| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Question about reliability? |
| Date: | 2000-11-09 16:00:37 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20001110030037.02cd2210@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 10:43 9/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Would there be any potential to avoid these (possibly) unnecessary deaths?
>
>No, at least it'll never get my vote.
>
Presumably other than limiting to one 'database' per installation?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-09 16:04:39 | Re: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2000-11-09 15:53:37 | Re: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 |