From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 |
Date: | 2000-11-09 12:40:56 |
Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20001109234056.00a37b20@mail.rhyme.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 08:59 9/11/00 +0100, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
>
>> Just seems like we'd be forcing non-standard syntax on
>> ourselves when/if
>> CREATE DATABASE becomes CREATE SCHEMA;
>
>I do not think this will be the way.
>
I know there was a lot of discussion of this a while ago, but was there a
consistant set of decisions made?
I'd be very interested if someone could post the current thinking re:
schemas, catalogs, and environments, because the way I read the SQL99 docs,
the catalog seems to correspond to a single postgres installation, and a
schema seems to correspond to a postgres database (ie. tables and views are
defined in a schema, and schemas are defined in a catalog, and catalogs are
defined in an environment, and it looks like the environment is akin to the
file system/implementation & postmaster).
Presumably this was raised before, but I'd love to see the consensus view,
if it is documented.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Philip Warner | 2000-11-09 13:08:22 | Question about reliability? |
Previous Message | Karel Zak | 2000-11-09 08:23:41 | Re: AW: Re: [GENERAL] Query caching |