| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | kogorman(at)pacbell(dot)net |
| Cc: | PGSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: I believe it will (was Re: Hmm, will this do?) |
| Date: | 2000-10-30 03:40:09 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20001030144009.02c4bd90@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 17:52 29/10/00 -0800, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>
>I'm afraid that for now, we should accept the improvements that
>have been achieved, and consider a more general treatment of
>parentheses later.
>
>What do you think?
>
Just to clarify: what is the status of the improvements that are
implemented? Are you saying we have ORDER/LIMIT in subselect, but the only
thing not added is multiple levels of parentheses?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-10-30 04:02:48 | Re: WAL status update |
| Previous Message | Kevin O'Gorman | 2000-10-30 01:52:02 | Re: I believe it will (was Re: Hmm, will this do?) |