From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c) |
Date: | 2000-10-27 10:43:52 |
Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20001027204352.00a06540@mail.rhyme.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
At 20:17 26/10/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>Possibly the optimizer should always assume that cursors ought to
>be optimized for fast start, LIMIT or no LIMIT --- does that seem
>like a good idea to you?
>
No to me; I'd vote for an 'OPTIMIZE FOR FAST START' phrase ahead of always
doing a fast start. It also seems natural that a LIMIT clause should (a)
limit the results in all cases and (b) be used by the optimiser in such a
way that it *considers* a fast start approach more carefully.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Philip Warner | 2000-10-27 10:50:17 | Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-27 05:20:32 | Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Philip Warner | 2000-10-27 10:50:17 | Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c) |
Previous Message | Emils Klotins | 2000-10-27 09:00:27 | Re: renaming columns... danger? |