From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TODO updates |
Date: | 2000-07-24 03:35:13 |
Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20000724133513.01f8b9d0@mail.rhyme.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 23:27 23/07/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> The actual list of things it moves to the end is: TABLE DATA, BLOBS, INDEX,
>> TRIGGER, RULE and ACL. The underlying table for a view is created in OID
>> order, so I would guess that referencing it in an SQL function would still
>> be OK. Is that OK?
>
>Oh, I see, you're emitting the underlying table and the rule separately.
>Yeah, I think that will probably work.
This one bothers me a little actually; I would prefer if it output a valid
'Create View' statement, in which case it would have to go in OID order.
Where possible, I want the output to be vanilla SQL, but I probably won't
do it yet.
>Is it safe to postpone ACL setting? Less sure about that ... I think
>the rule parser checks ACLs at parse time instead of execution, for
>example.
Well, the theory I was working on was that it was possible that the ACLs
would deny the current user access to parts of the database, so I put them
at the end.
Do you mean that by putting the ACLs at the end I may be allowing access
(via the rule parser) that is inappropriate?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-24 03:50:13 | Re: TODO updates |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-24 03:27:59 | Re: TODO updates |