| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_backup symlink? |
| Date: | 2000-07-10 22:33:11 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20000711083311.029f4450@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
At 00:24 11/07/00 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Philip Warner writes:
>
>> Does anyone have a philosophical objection to a symlink from pg_dump to
>> (new) pg_backup?
>
>Yes. The behaviour of a program should not depend on the name used to
>invoke it. You can use shell aliases or scripts for that.
OK, I suppose I was thinking of the pg_dump symlink as a tool for
compatibility.
Is there a good solution? It dumps to text for compatibility with the old
pg_dump, but I will most often use 'pg_dump -Fc --blob'. Is there a
recommended 'correct' approach?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-07-10 22:34:34 | Re: Link to postgesql components |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-07-10 22:24:36 | Re: pg_backup symlink? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-07-10 22:35:58 | Re: pg_backup symlink? |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2000-07-10 22:28:18 | Re: more corruption |