Re: Re: pg_dump and LOs (another proposal)

At 11:09 5/07/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> Having now flirted with recreating BLOBs (and even DBs) with matching OIDs,
>> I find myself thinking it's a waste of effort for the moment. A modified
>> version of the system used by Pavel Janik in pg_dumplo may be substantially
>> more reliable than my previous proposal:
>
>I like this a lot better than trying to restore the original OIDs. For
>one thing, the restore-original-OIDs idea cannot be made to work if what
>we want to do is load additional tables into an existing database.
>

The thing that bugs me about this if for 30,000 rows, I do 30,000 updates
after the restore. It seems *really* inefficient, not to mention slow.

I'll also have to modify pg_restore to talk to the database directly (for
lo import). As a result I will probably send the entire script directly
from withing pg_restore. Do you know if comment parsing ('--') is done in
the backend, or psql?

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/