From: | Lincoln Yeoh <lylyeoh(at)mecomb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Marten Feldtmann <marten(at)feki(dot)toppoint(dot)de>, Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net> |
Cc: | Elmar(dot)Haneke(at)gmx(dot)de, pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Re: [General] pgsql on win95 |
Date: | 2000-02-23 04:04:42 |
Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20000223120442.0084ca00@pop.mecomb.po.my |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
At 07:07 PM 22-02-2000 +0100, Marten Feldtmann wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Feb 2000 Elmar(dot)Haneke(at)gmx(dot)de wrote:
>>
>> Is there really an interest in spending the extra money for a
>> Windows license to build a less reliable database server?
>>
>
> Hmmm, try to think about an application, which normally runs on a server,
>but then is also wanted (with much less data) on a notebook ...
Erm I got linux running on my notebook. It's got a phone directories on it,
with a web app to access it.
Think about it, you get a server with a 2+ hour UPS, built in portable
console screen.
Even rack mountable with the proper kit ;).
If only notebooks were more reliable, then we could make cool routers out
of them..
Hmm, router with routing tables stored in postgres (multilevel cached of
course for performance) <grin>. Nah.... hehehe.
Cheerio,
Link.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | omid omoomi | 2000-02-23 04:37:10 | Re: [GENERAL] RestrictionClauseSelectivity |
Previous Message | Lincoln Yeoh | 2000-02-23 03:57:37 | Re: [GENERAL] Calender |