Re: [GENERAL] locking/insert into table and transactions

From: Lincoln Yeoh <lylyeoh(at)mecomb(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] locking/insert into table and transactions
Date: 1999-11-26 09:04:09
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.19991126170409.00841b20@pop.mecomb.po.my
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I'd like to prevent duplicate ids from being inserted into a table. I can
let the database enforce it by using UNIQUE or PRIMARY KEY. But assuming I
prefer to catch such things with the application, what would be the best
way of doing it?

The only way I figured to do it was to use:
begin;
lock table accounts;
select count(*) from accounts where id=$number;
if count=0, insert into accounts (id,etc) values ($number,$etc)
commit;

Is this a good idea? Or is it much better and faster to let the database
catch things?

Is it faster to use "select count(*) from accounts" or "select id from
accounts"?

Apparently count(*) has some speed optimizations in MySQL. So wondering if
there are similar things in Postgres.

Thanks,

Link.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Silvio Macedo 1999-11-26 09:28:59 Re: [GENERAL] Postgres on Ultrasparc
Previous Message Oleg Broytmann 1999-11-26 08:46:12 Re: [GENERAL] Postgres on Ultrasparc

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SEV 1999-11-26 09:38:15 AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions
Previous Message Adriaan Joubert 1999-11-26 07:12:09 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type